The Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection,
Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure came out with a sweeping new
report (called the JNC 7) on the treatment and diagnosis of high blood
pressure in America, published in the Journal of the American Medical
Association (JAMA), on May 21, 2003.
Whereas hypertension has traditionally been defined as a
blood pressure reading above 140/90, this reports documents the health risks of
readings as low as 115/75, and proposes a new category of illness; anyone with
a blood pressure of 120-139 over 80-89 is now considered to be
pre-hypertensive. The report goes on to explain that although understanding of
the risks of hypertension continues to grow, treatment rates have stagnated,
and only 34% of hypertensive patients have successfully reached optimal
control, despite a wealth of new drugs and nonpharmacologic recommendations.
The authors, echoed by an editorial in the same issue of JAMA, enthusiastically
outline the potential benefits of earlier and more aggressive blood pressure
reduction in terms of longevity and quality of life.
As a family practitioner in private practice for over 20
years, I believe the findings of this report, although undoubtedly correct from
a factual standpoint, are not likely to lead to better health, and may well
create as many problems as they solve.
There exists a powerful medical-pharmaceutical complex in
this country whose goal it is to redefine life as a continual disease. As a
society, we have become ever more accepting of increasing diversity in realms
such as religion, sexual orientation, racial attitudes and gender roles. And
yet, ironically, the parameters of what is considered normal from a physical
and mental health perspective are shrinking at an alarming rate. Restless,
dreamy or action-oriented children are, by the millions, being labeled as
having ADHD. Women undergoing the normal physiologic process of menopause have,
en bloc, been diagnosed as hormone-deficient. Clinical depression, or better
yet, serotonin depletion, is the new explanation for periods of melancholia,
stress, unexplained fatigue, or grief. Hardly anyone who has reached middle age
can escape from having some sort of pre-cancerous condition, either in the
skin, breast, bowel or prostate. And as the definition of normal or optimal
levels of cholesterol has steadily decreased, from 300, to 240, 200, to 170 or
even lower for certain groups of people, who among us can escape the
frightening noose?
Now, lest anyone foolishly consider him or herself healthy,
we can add tens of millions of pre-hypertensives to the rolls of those in need
of salvation by our noble medical knights.
Although the JNC 7 correctly states the "adoption of
healthy lifestyles by all individuals is critical for the prevention of high BP
and an indispensable part of the management of those with hypertension,"
the medical profession has proven itself woefully unsuccessful in promoting
weight restriction, regular exercise, a healthy diet or, in fact, any lifestyle
changes at all other than taking medication and utilizing medical resources
such as doctor visits, mammograms, CAT scans, etc. If we, as physicians, have
been so unsuccessful in helping patients to achieve current blood pressure
goals, is it reasonable to expect that extending the goals down to 120/80 is
likely to result in more compliance? The only guaranteed outcome of the study
is that doctor visits and procedures such as stress tests will increase, and
more drugs will be sold. This is surely good news for the business of selling
medical services and pharmaceuticals. And the general level of stress and fear,
already so pervasive in our society, will increase, as millions of Americans
will have another condition to worry about. Fortunately, we have drugs for that
too.
At a deeper level, there is something terribly wrong with
having to define everyone as being ill in order to make them healthier. The
Greeks had a better understanding. Their god of healing, Aesklepios, had two
daughters, Panacea and Hygeiea. The former, as her name implies, was
responsible for healing disease, but Hygeiea, (his favorite), had the task of
promoting health. And until we, as a medical profession and a society, can come
beyond disease prevention to a true concept of health promotion, we shall
remain mired in an ever-increasing spiral of more drugs, more medicalization of
life, ever rising health care costs, and an elusive promise of better health.
Richard Fried, M.D. has been in private family practice in
Kimberton, PA for 24 years. He is certified by both the American Board of
Family Practice and the American Board of Anthroposophically-Extended Medicine.
He was voted "Best Family Doctor" in a poll of readers of The
Phoenix, his local newspaper, for 2003.