Childhood Immunization Programs
Questions from the Anthroposophic Point of View
Part I (Original title: Impfungen im Kindesalter. Fragen aus anthroposophischer Sicht. Merkurstab 1995; 48:313-22. English by A. R. Meuss, FIL, MTA.)
Vol. 12, Nr. 4
Karl-Reinhard Kummer
Abstract
In view of the large number of immunizations recommended and the publicity-driven pressure on critics of mass immunization, it will be necessary to
take a fundamental approach to the whole process. Immunization cannot be
said to be an attenuated form of the disease. It is a specific memory process in
which the child's powers of antipathy are enhanced. Immunizations are thus
similar to what happens at a more advanced age. Boosters correspond in
principle to allergic processes. Immunizations enforce peripheral digestive
activity that may demand too much of the organism. This may pave the way
for allergies.
Long-term effects on health cannot be adequately assessed, despite mass
programs. Apart from immediate side effects there may be changes in
infection spectrum. The actual goal of immunization, which is to reduce the
number of injections, may not be reached. Gaps in the program may cause
the immune status of whole population sections to be reduced rather than
enhanced.
Lack of information on fundamental aspects of immunization is considerable.
This concerns schedules, the number of immunizations required or
the problem of failures. Information is also needed on the epidemiological
effect of major campaigns. Studies on the individual rather than collective
statistical methods are demanded.
Global mass immunization programs do not meet individual requirements.
The individual or the parents must be allowed to make an individual
decision for every immunization procedure.
Current situation
The Staendige Impfkommission (STIKO, Permanent Commission on
Immunization) in Germany made major changes to its recommendations in 1994. Diphtheria immunization is recommended more strongly, HIB vaccine to be
used up to four times for all infants and young children, MMR vaccine
during the 15th month and at age 5 for all children, pertussis vaccine in
combination with diphtheria and tetanus (DPT) three times in infancy and a
fourth time in the second year of life.
Little emphasis is put on the risks of cellular pertussis vaccines, with
pertussis immunization recommended for children with neurologic disease,
though the final responsibility is left to the physician. Some "children with
progressive neurologic disease, seizures, neurologic conditions that
frequently involve seizures"... are stated to be "greatly at risk." "The
physician must therefore weigh the risks carefully." Acellular pertussis
vaccines still have to prove their value in practice.
Twenty-nine routine immunizations against eight diseases are
recommended up to the age of 15, about twice the number recommended by
Stickl.
A look at some vaccines
Immunizations and vaccines differ, and distinction must be made especially
between immunizations against virus and bacterial infections and those
against toxins. Vaccines against viruses are often called "live" vaccines.
Quast et al. write: "Use of live vaccines means injection of live attenuated
pathogens, i.e. their virulence has been reduced ...." This is incorrect. Virus
substance does have some of the properties of life forms but not the
properties of life. It can induce specific reactions in the living organism. These
are, however, different in quality, e.g. with BCG vaccine, than those seen with
measles immunization. Considering them to be equal, as done by Quast et al.
(p. 20f.) or Fenyves and Kurth, ignores the differences that exist for vital
processes in the organism.
Vaccines against bacterial antigens
Rook distinguishes between toxins, capsular polysaccharides, a mixture of
toxins in Bordetella pertussis, lipopolysaccharides in Neisseria gonorrhea and
unknown antigens in BCG vaccine (see also Paswell). In his view, problems
increase in the given sequence.
According to Steiner, bacteria are "animal plants." They may flourish
where there is an excessive "tendency to become animal." Bacterial processes
belong to the anabolic aspect of the organism. It is therefore understandable
why bacterial vaccines have poor immunizing effects (BCG or live typhoid
vaccines). Apart from the toxins, they are not well tolerated, which also
applies to cellular pertussis vaccine. Excessive reactions such as BCG
abscesses may occur. The antigens to BCG vaccination are not yet known.
Natural immunization against bacterial capsular antigens such as
Haemophilus influenzae B starts only at 18 months, with a reliable level of
immunity reached only at age 3. Present-day vaccines provoke an immune
response even in infants, because bacterial antigens that are not very
immunogenic before the third year are conjugated with another antigen -
diphtheria, tetanus or meningococcus toxoids. Conjugation of Haemophilus
vaccines may be said to be "toxification." The toxoids raise the process to a
level where astral antipathies are active. The possible consequences of this
are not yet known.
Bacterial infections are a puzzle to this day. Heininger showed that while
there were pertussis symptoms with whooping cough and parapertussis, no
pertussis toxin had been found.9 In the case of HIB immunization, information
on the role of antibody affinity is limited, .... reflecting physio-
chemical bonding or accurate antibody-to-antigen fit; ... antibody affinity
does not necessarily have to correlate with the antibody concentration.
Vaccines against viral antigens
Virus infections indicate a marked tendency towards mineralization and
decomposition processes. The organism is forced to produce and replicate
the foreign virus substance until it recovers. Healing will only begin if
inflammatory reactions are possible. Zur Linden therefore postulated that
viruses related to the destructive pole in the organism, i.e. the nervous
system. The trend is evident in breakdown of the mucosa with aphthous
stomatitis, for instance, or chickenpox. T cells perish in vitro after measles
infection, resulting in a form of immunosuppression about which little is
known. Cellular immunity, e.g. the tuberculin reaction, is reduced during
measles infections.
The inflammatory changes seen with virus infections represent the
second, reconstructive healing phase. Measles exanthem actually indicates
that (artificial) immunity is beginning to develop. The exanthema subitum
of infants, which only develops when the process has finished, is a typical instance.
Because of the mineralizing tendency, it is easy to see why complications
seen with immunization against virus diseases such as measles, mumps and
rubella affect the nervous system. Degeller ascribed this to the effect mineral
substances have on the Ego. The fact that pregnant women have good
immunity against virus infections is also explained by increased catabolic
activity. Compared to bacterial infections such as tuberculosis or pertussis,
where this type of immunity is poor, the cellular component of immunity is
less important.
Remarkably little is known about the role of the host. A number of
measles virus subtypes are known, but no conclusions can be drawn from
this. The polio vaccine virus clearly changes considerably in its passage
through the gastrointestinal tract. For combined immunization against types
1, 2 and 3, parts of type 2 are incorporated in attenuated type 3 virus.
Numerous other dramatic mutations develop during the weeks following
vaccination. Elimination of the vaccine virus takes longer than assumed. In
spite of so many facts being known, many questions remain open with
reference to the oral polio vaccine.
Vaccines against toxins
Greater certainty exists with regard to vaccination against bacterial toxins.
Vaccination with toxoids may be seen as addressing the astral body directly.
This is able to react adequately by producing antitoxins. Digestion in the
metabolic system is necessary but requires relatively little effort.
Immunostimulation is at a high level, and tolerance relatively good.
With immunity limited to toxin activity, transmission of the bacteria is
possible despite protection against developing diphtheria. Tetanus shows
relatively little metabolic activity, at least compared to diphtheria, which
may, among other things, lead to enlargement of lymph nodes. This explains
why immunization against tetanus is possible at the intrauterine stage but
immunization against diphtheria, which is more metabolic by nature, only at
about 3 months.
Vaccination and disease
The aim of immunization is to develop antibodies. Many physicians consider
vaccination to be an attenuated form of the disease which has a positive effect
on the child's developing immune status. Early vaccinations done by the
ancient Chinese or Jenner were intended to avoid serious illness by giving a
mild one. The current view is that apart from antibody production, vaccination and disease have little in common.
This limitation to antibody induction was Behring's aim more than 100
years ago. He was only interested in the antitoxic effects. Initially he tried to
treat sepsis with iodoform, "like preserving a ham against putrefaction by
smoking it," and came to the following conclusion: "Let us assume the
morbific effect of virulent pus depends on the presence not only of pus
bacteria but also of their chemical products; let us also assume that those
chemical products are influenced by iodoform, rather like cadaverin. This
explains why iodoform can have a medicinal effect in virulent disease
without causing appreciable direct damage to the microorganisms." He
suspected that "laws can be demonstrated according to which a relationship
exists between an animal's immunity to a bacterial disease and the
antibacterial activity of its serum." In 1899 he wrote: "Nothing in the world
is influenced by tetanus antitoxin, except tetanus toxin."
In 1901, he started his attempts, together with Katashima, to immunize
monkeys with diphtheria toxin, "transferring genuine diphtheria bacilli, the
virulence of which has been attenuated, to the human throat organs for the
purpose of auto-immunization." He felt the body had to be forced to produce
a species-specific antitoxin "that, unlike a foreign antitoxin, remains in the
blood for a long time and therefore confers protection against diphtheria for a
year and a day.
Vaccination and disease are almost completely dissociated today. Febrile
reactions to vaccination are rare in healthy subjects. This means that vaccination
has essentially become a process to which there is no inflammatory
reaction, a process of coldness. The specific immunization process,
vaccination and the general reaction, a respiratory tract infection, may
actually run side by side. Mild disease is not considered a contraindication
for vaccination. Dennehy et al. found that seroconversion against measles,
mumps and rubella was the same in children with and without respiratory
tract infection. Like Peter, they concluded that respiratory tract infection is
not a contraindication. Long-term side effects were not investigated.
It is, in fact, contraindicated to induce disease by vaccination. With this in
mind, many physicians give prophylactic antipyretics when doing a
vaccination, even if there is no medical reason for this. Suppression of
symptoms is the general principle with vaccination and disease, m the case of
vaccination they are usually referred to as "reactions" rather than "complications."
The distinction depends on whether it is felt that side effects should
be presented as serious or made to look harmless.
Quast et al.’s reference to "vaccination disease" is inconsistent. The virus
count does increase with "vaccination measles," but the symptoms are not
those of the wild disease. Above all the characteristic psychic changes do not
develop. BCG vaccination will result in enlargement of regional lymph nodes
or tuberculous skin abscesses. The process shifts to the skin. With
tuberculosis it takes place in the internal organism ("hysteria taking place
directly in the ether body").
Time form of diseases
A disease is a process in time. Weckenmann investigated tonsillitis and myocardial infarction and found alternation between general and local symptoms
following definite laws. This was especially apparent with childhood
diseases, but also nephritis, pneumonia and myocardial infarction. Girke
found this also applied to sclerotic symptoms. Sclerotic substance is
produced during the local phases. A disease goes through numerous
rhythmic intermediary processes before recovery is achieved. The recovery
process may on occasion be painful but is a necessary part. "Silent" measles
immunization is also a process. Here, it is open to the individual to gain
immunity with or without manifest disease. The different incubation periods
of many infectious diseases suggest that some room exists for individual
variation. Evolution is, in fact, always individual, even with the same disease.
Vaccination does not take this course in time. It may go against the normal
time schedule and prevent the disease in the case of rabies or measles.
The building up and breaking down processes normally seen with the
disease do not develop/ and particularly also the process of ultimate
recovery. Instead of the organism being restructured once the infection is
overcome, there is only the development of immune memory, with no
healing process.
Vaccination comes from outside, with the organism exposed to it.
Behring actually spoke of "forcing" the organism. Vaccination is not intended
to be individual but predictable, planned, uniform. An individual process
also becomes impossible with regard to onset. With contagious diseases such
as measles or chickenpox, some children will not contract the disease on
contact but only at a later date or never. They have their own special place in
the biography, as does pneumonia. Vaccination makes such individual
evolution impossible. The situation becomes even more serious when booster
shots are given (v.i.).
Entry port into the organism
The normal port of entry into the organism, such as the mucosa or lymphatic
system of the gastrointestinal tract, is not used as a rule. Behring still went in
that direction in his attempts to "vaccinate" the tonsils with diphtheria bacilli.
Vaccination by injection or scarification circumvents the digestive process,
creating a minor wound and enforcing "parenteral digestion," without
addressing the lymphatic system directly. From the anthroposophic point of
view we must ask whether injections of any kind do not harm the "rhythmic
system," unless the medicament is specially prepared. By its very nature such
a medicament is not designed for digestive processes. The organism is
mainly protected against foreign matter, "poisoning" by foreign foods, in
the gastrointestinal tract, with a limit set to destructive digestive processes.
In the process of digestion, food and organism enter into a close
relationship between inner and outer. Weckenmann referred to this as a
gesture of sympathy. At the same time a pause is created for the organism, a
kind of buffer zone between inner and outer, before the food substances
reach the inner organism by the lymphatic route. As a result, contact between
foreign matter that is not yet fully degraded and the lymph or blood which is
wholly one's own can be delayed a little. It is different with vaccination. Here
the foreign substance, generally given by the parenteral route, demands
instant reaction, which puts it close to a forced reflex.
Weckenmann states that digestion outside the intestinal tract occurs only
under pathological conditions, as with inflammation. Thus, "parenteral
digestion" demands sacrifices from the organism that take the form of
abscesses. Any injection calls for "parenteral digestion." The negative effect
an injection has on the organism is not purely academic. Strebel et al. found
that in 87% of cases of paralytic vaccination polio in Rumania one or several
intramuscular injections had been given during the 30 days preceding onset
of paralysis.
Problem of elimination
Typical childhood diseases have accompanying eliminatory processes. This
may take the form of exanthem, diarrhea or vomiting, with the incidence
remarkably high, as shown in a retrospective study by the author. This
corrects the variable imbalances between the upper and lower human being
as the disease evolves. Exanthema may be seen as peripheral "digestion,"
and equated with healing. Vaccination does not offer this potential, apart
from so-called side effects. This may result in premature sclerotic changes.
With suppression of symptoms, immunizations have become memory
and neurosensory processes. Reading Behring's writings we realize that
metabolic activity is to be as far as possible excluded. This has two consequences.
First, there is no possibility for creating a counterbalance to this neurosensory
activity in the metabolic sphere. Secondly, this sense-related function is in
the sphere of metabolism. The only kind of counter process the metabolism
can find is a metabolic reaction in the sphere of the nerves and
senses. The relationship between the upper and the lower human being is
thus put under a strain.
Immunizations therefore increase a tendency to higher sensitivity in the
nervous system, as described by Wolff. With a strain put on the memory
and sensory functions of the organism, it is easy to see why side effects
frequently involve the nerves or the senses, e.g. as encephalophathy with
pertussis or diphtheria immunization or meningitic changes with measles
immunization. The memory functions of the metabolic system are challenged
by foreign substances. At the same time the actual metabolic processes,
manufacture of the vaccine, take place outside the organism. Steiner referred
to the effect of excessive demands made on the organism through external
processes in the lower human being as hysteria.
Immunization and memory
A child is a creature of the senses; powers of growth with their sympathy
dominate the picture. Sensory processes, tasting processes are active all the
way to the body periphery. In the first 7 years of life the physical foundation
for the individuality is created. In no other period of life is the tension
between "inner" and "outer" as great as in childhood when body substance
is created and infectious aspects of the environment have to be overcome.
During its first 7 years a child should only receive easily digestible
quantities of new impressions. We know that infants may react with colic to
mother's milk and with shyness to strangers. Mothers' milk is the least
foreign substance. Its constituents, e.g. iron, are easily taken up. Having high
physical surface activity and a high concentration of immunoglobulins it
protects the child's sensitive organism.
Memory is only possible if there is conscious awareness. This requires
powers of antipathy to the environment which infants and young children do
not have. A cold persists for a long time in infants. Virus infections do not
cause general febrile reactions followed by rapid recovery. Immunization is
only good from birth, and even in utero, in the case of toxoids. Before
mass measles immunization was so widespread, immunity conferred by the
mothers was so good that measles immunizations did not prove successful
before the 15th month. For a full discussion see Johnson et al., though they,
too, reported only 74% or 53% success rates with early vaccination in 1994,
depending on the method of investigation.
A child's early ability to remember is situation-bound. It will enter afresh
into the same situation full of sympathy, perhaps taking the same route again
in memory. Isolated facts are not remembered, and no note is taken of them.
Only processes are remembered. Vaccination is not a process but a single
event, with only the antipathetic aspect experienced. The absence of a process
may be one reason why the immunity conferred by vaccination is limited in
time, compared to that given by the wild disease (e.g. measles) which is life-
long.
Booster shots confer the desired long-term immunity. This, however, is
enforced memory and unphysiological in young children. Young children,
especially if under 3 years of age, experience every situation as something
new, even if they have known it before. This is the age when forgetting is
"practiced." Regular habits have an educative effect on the child. Isolated
events, on the other hand, especially if enforced, with no opportunity to take
them up in play, can prove harmful.
Immunizations, thus, represent one-sided emphasis on memory and
"head" processes. The rhythmic functions that facilitate digestion are
impeded if not made impossible.
Immunization and immune system
Little reliable information is available on the effect on immune status, though
it has been said that "postvaccinal immune weakness" after MMR immunization is possible, at least in theory. Acellular pertussis immunization, currently introduced
with considerable publicity, also raises many questions.
Immunization essentially addresses the specialized T cell functions of the
immune system, and the antigen specific B cell response. The response to
polysaccharide antigens begins in the 2nd or 3rd year and is only fully developed
in the 9th year. From the anthroposophic point of view, this is the
time when the "Ego" begins to intervene in metabolism. Children are then
able to relate fully to their environment both physically and psychologically.
Little is known about immunization effects on nonspecific immune
mechanisms. These are highly similar to digestive processes, e.g. complement
receptors binding viruses or bacteria, opsonization of these complexes
in macrophages and their elimination in the reticuloendothelial system of
spleen and liver. Induction of special antibody development may result in
nonspecific immune responses being neglected. This may apply especially if
vaccination is given in spite of respiratory tract infection. It enhances the
dissociation between specific and nonspecific immune processes. There are
children with poor resistance to infection, for instance, who have had a large
number of immunizations. This reminds of people with allergies who have
extremely high IgE levels.
Waking and sleeping, allergy and immunization
The level of consciousness in the upper human being is reduced during
illness. People are febrile, experience malaise and feel less bright. On the
other hand, they are awake and active in metabolism. The phase of quiescence
which follows is necessary to restore full performance capacity. In the
case of vaccination, the senses and nervous system are awake, perhaps even
excessively so due to the pain of the injection. Just as going to sleep can be
difficult after one-sided intellectual work, so can the "going-to-sleep processes"
after vaccination present problems because the calming metabolic
component is largely absent.
Nothing appears to be known concerning excessive strain on the immune
system. We know, however, from everyday life that it needs some degree of
health to cope with both physical and nerve stress. Following vaccination,
a foreign substance has to be "digested." There is a risk that the astral
body is put under strain by this and withdraws, becoming less mobile. As a
result the metabolism is not able to digest certain products properly. This
leads to conditions which Steiner referred to as childhood hysteria, with the
upper aspects of the human being involved outside the organism; the
organism is injured by foreign processes.
Unlike digestion, vaccination entails sudden contact with foreign matter.
In digestion, food is broken down and assimilated in numerous stages. The
foreign matter, intestinal mucosa and flora are in close contact. This involves
both sympathetic and antipathetic elements. Sympathetic aspects predominate
in the absorption stage. Antipathy only gains the upper hand in the
region of the large intestine. The child is actively involved in the process of
digestion. The same can be said of childhood play, when the doing is more
important than the outcome. With vaccination, the organism is not asked to
"digest," and the assimilation process occurs outside the organism in the
form of attenuation, production of toxoids, etc.
Weckenmann sees immunity as a process and not a stable state. A
disease process alternates between local and general symptoms. Someone
who is immune, he says, does not continue in the immune state but is
particularly responsive. In his view, the third step in disease is that "it is a
form of further development if it helps the individual to develop 'immunity'
or encounters an immune individual." For a cure, the right level of reaction
has to be found, and for this Weckenmann suggests the term "euergy" rather
than immunity. A cure thus represents restoration of the normal conditions
under which the organism is able to digest, with losses minimized
(economically).
People liable to develop allergies clearly have a general digestive
weakness. This is known from the fact that cow's milk proteins taken as food
by the mother remain essentially unchanged, passing through numerous
barriers, and can be demonstrated in the child's blood. It should also be
remembered that the nonspecific immune system is mainly associated with
the intestinal tract. An allergic subject thus has the double handicap of
primary digestive weakness and primary nonspecific immune deficiency.
Another aspect is the time of first contact. Early contact increases the risk
of allergization. Thus it is possible for individuals to be allergic to pollen
grains that were seasonal at the time of their birth. This reveals the
importance of setting limits. With vaccinations given to very young infants it
is possible that the good tolerance shown is merely apparent, and that
vaccination only had minor side effects because reactivity had not yet
developed. No connection has so far been established, however, between
vaccination and subsequent immune capacities.
Problems often arise with the third DPT immunization. Booster shots
intentionally interrupt the normal forgetting process. The individual is forced
to deal with the foreign substance and unable to avoid it. It is therefore not
only the second vaccination which presents problems but also revaccination
using the same antigen.
An important aspect is who is in control of forgetting and remembering.
Reduced antibody levels after immunization indicate that the organism tends
to forget the immunization. Booster immunizations make this impossible.
With the disease, the Ego is involved in maintaining immunity for life. With
immunization this has to happen from outside. This could be a further
explanation of the allergy potential, of being unable to forget, due to
immunization.
Even the minor shocks infants show in reaction to injections have
significance. The pain of an injection drives the Ego and the astral body out
of the rest of the body. This is all the more so once children are older when
revaccinated and experience the event more strongly. Physiologic memory
processes in childhood take a very different course (v.s.).
Many of the processes involved in vaccination therefore correspond to
those seen with allergies. An allergic individual does not forget but is
wounded all over again on contact with the allergen, retaining the
pathological memory. Renewed contact does not result in a better, but in a
worse, reaction. The allergic compulsion of having to react again and again to
a foreign substance is applied on purpose with booster shots. The Ego is
coerced from outside. This will above all make processes of rest impossible,
which the human being chooses in sleeping and waking, for instance.
Boostering enforces wakefulness in the immune system.
The allergic phenomena have to be seen as an attempt at elimination,
e.g. the powerful secretion of mucus in allergic conjunctivitis, rhinitis or
bronchitis. Aggravation of allergic symptoms after vaccination may be seen
as an attempt on the part of the organism to forget the vaccination in order to
heal itself.
Standard works on pediatric immunology do refer to the problems that
arise with immunization of allergic subjects but say little about the allergy
potential of immunization. Stueck, too, merely mentions short-term
aggravation of neurodermatitis with MMR immunization. Quast et al. do,
however, admit: "It has been stated that skin diseases may be exacerbated by
immunization. An effect on endogenous eczema (often positive, occasionally
negative) due to measles immunization is certainly possible.. .." Bauer states
that no work has been done to find an answer to this question. In the
author's experience, onset of neurodermatitis was frequently preceded by
immunization.
Quast et al. list a number of local and general reactions that are clearly
allergic by nature (pp. 162-194). Their assumption is, though there is nothing
as yet to prove it: "Reactions of this kind, representing allergy to vaccine
constituents, are, however, extremely rare..." (p. 176). On the other hand,
they accept "general intolerance of hen's eggs, though anaphylactic and other
allergic symptoms have not been clinically confirmed."
Peter accepts only extremely severe hypersensitive reactions as a
contraindication to revaccination. Nowadays MMR immunization is
actually recommended for children allergic to egg-white. Reinhardt says:
"There is nothing to indicate that the usual immunizations pave the way for
food or inhalation allergies. This applies both to the normal population and
to individuals with a high risk of developing an allergy (positive family
history and raised umbilical cord IgE)."
According to Reinhardt, allergic reactions to vaccines may be due to
auxiliary agents, but with today's highly purified vaccines such reactions are
extremely rare. Again, no empirical data are given to support these
statements.
Immunization - a process relating to old age
Childhood diseases have to do with the head pole coming to terms with
metabolism. In most instances, metabolic processes go up into the sphere of
the nervous system. These diseases are acute and febrile. Warmth processes
and anabolism predominate, especially in morbidity. If there were no excess
of febrile and anabolic processes, degenerative processes would develop. It is
only in older children that the middle, rhythmic function establishes a
balance.
Later in life, growth and regeneration become less active. Catabolic
processes predominate. Sensory functions are also different in old people.
Reticence takes the place of sympathetic reaction. With immunization, this is,
in fact, desirable: recognition of the antigen with minimal systemic reaction
and maximum efficiency in antibody production. Yet this process, which
belongs to a more advanced age, is generally applied in childhood and youth.
The antipathetic reaction pattern of immunizations may result in premature
aging and catabolic processes.
Vaccine production involves death processes. Zur Linden drew attention
to this in 1962. Polio vaccine is cultivated on monkey kidneys, chick
embryos or human diploid cells taken out of their vital context. To avoid
direct toxic reactions substances have to be added to attenuate and inactivate
the pathogen. Other potentially harmful additives are disinfectants, solvents,
emulsifiers, etc. These may also cause side effects.
Cell cultures used to grow the pathogen are artificially kept alive; it is
worth noting that they are largely cultures based on tumor cells, i.e. a
pathological life process is cultivated for the sake of the vaccine and not to
serve the human organism. We thus have a reversal of goals, for it is not the
human being who is vitalized in the process but the vaccine.
Karl-Reinhard Kummer, M.D.
Jaegerstr. 19
D-076227 Karlsruhe
Germany